Skip to main content

L-Tryptophan


Basic information
Metabolite name

L-Tryptophan

HMDB0000929
C00078
6305
Synonyms

Tryptophane;
Tryptophan;
Trp

No. of studies

144

 

Relationship between L-Tryptophan and depression (count: 144)
Study Study Type Comparison groups Tissue Organism Up/Down regulated
Study M002 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Cerebral cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M002 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Thalamus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M003 Type1 day 27 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M005 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M008 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M009 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M009 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M009 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of Xiaoyaosan group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M009 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M009 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Xiaoyaosan group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M018 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M024 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M024 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M024 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M033 Type3 paroxetine group vs. control group Hippocampus DBA/2OlaHsd mouse Down
Study M037 Type2 sertraline treatment group four-week vs. baseline Serum Human Up
Study M042 Type3 fluoxetine group vs. control group Cerebrospinal fluid Rhesus monkey Down
Study M046 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Dorsal hippocampus C57BL/6N mouse Up
Study M046 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Nucleus accumbens C57BL/6N mouse Up
Study M046 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Central amygdala C57BL/6N mouse Up
Study M048 Type1 CVS group vs. control group Serum Wistar rat Down
Study M048 Type2 CVS + CSGS group vs. CVS group Serum Wistar rat Up
Study M048 Type2 CVS + fluoxetine group vs. CVS group Serum Wistar rat Up
Study M061 Type1 depressed group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M068 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M069 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M072 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M072 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M076 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M076 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M076 Type2 CUMS + Anemarrhena saponins and Lilium saponins group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M079 Type1 acute LPS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M087 Type2 esketamine group 2-h vs. baseline Plasma Human Down
Study M095 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M096 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Down
Study M096 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Wistar rat Down
Study M096 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Wistar rat Down
Study M096 Type2 CUMS + paroxetine group vs. CUMS group Plasma Wistar rat Up
Study M096 Type2 CUMS + paroxetine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Wistar rat Up
Study M096 Type2 CUMS + paroxetine group vs. CUMS group Prefrontal cortex Wistar rat Up
Study M1004 Type2 CUMS + Zhi-Zi-Chi decoctions group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1004 Type2 CUMS + Zhi-Zi-Chi decoctions group vs. CUMS group Ileum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1005 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1005 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Ileum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1005 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1005 Type2 CUMS + butyrate group vs. CUMS group Ileum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1005 Type2 CUMS + butyrate group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1005 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Ileum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1005 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1005 Type2 CUMS + butyrate group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1005 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1008 Type2 CCFM1025 group vs. placebo group Faece Human Up
Study M1015 Type1 lipopolysaccharide group vs. control group Cortex C57BL/6J mouse Up
Study M1015 Type1 lipopolysaccharide group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6J mouse Up
Study M1015 Type2 lipopolysaccharide + amitriptyline group vs. lipopolysaccharide group Cortex C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M1015 Type2 lipopolysaccharide + high dose of soy isoflavones group vs. lipopolysaccharide group Cortex C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M1015 Type2 lipopolysaccharide + high dose of soy isoflavones group vs. lipopolysaccharide group Hippocampus C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M1015 Type2 lipopolysaccharide + low dose of soy isoflavones group vs. lipopolysaccharide group Cortex C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M1015 Type2 lipopolysaccharide + middle dose of soy isoflavones group vs. lipopolysaccharide group Cortex C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M1015 Type2 lipopolysaccharide + middle dose of soy isoflavones group vs. lipopolysaccharide group Hippocampus C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M1015 Type2 lipopolysaccharide + amitriptyline group vs. lipopolysaccharide group Hippocampus C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M1015 Type2 lipopolysaccharide + low dose of soy isoflavones group vs. lipopolysaccharide group Hippocampus C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M1024 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group CA3 region of hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M1024 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group CA1 region of hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M1024 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group DG region of hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M1025 Type2 CUMS + Bacillus licheniformis group vs. CUMS group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1033 Type1 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic constipation group vs. control group Urine Human Down
Study M1033 Type2 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic constipation group, after rifaximin treatment vs. baseline Urine Human Up
Study M1033 Type2 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic diarrhea group, after rifaximin treatment vs. baseline Urine Human Up
Study M1039 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1039 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Angelicae Sinensis Radix group vs. CUMS group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1039 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Angelicae Sinensis Radix group vs. CUMS group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M104 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1054 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma ICR mouse Down
Study M1054 Type2 CUMS + ChaihuYujinxiang granules group vs. CUMS group Plasma ICR mouse Up
Study M1059 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Colon Wistar rat Up
Study M1059 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Serum Wistar rat Down
Study M1059 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Cortex Wistar rat Down
Study M1059 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Striatum Wistar rat Down
Study M1059 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Down
Study M1063 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M1071 Type1 depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M1075 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M1081 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Brain C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M1081 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Colon C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M1081 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M1081 Type2 CUMS + 1-methyl-tryptophan group vs. CUMS group Serum C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1081 Type2 CUMS + 1-methyl-tryptophan group vs. CUMS group Colon C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1081 Type2 CUMS + 1-methyl-tryptophan group vs. CUMS group Brain C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1081 Type3 1-methyl-tryptophan group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1081 Type3 1-methyl-tryptophan group vs. control group Brain C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1081 Type3 1-methyl-tryptophan group vs. control group Colon C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1082 Type1 interferon gamma group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M1082 Type1 interferon gamma group vs. control group Colon C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M1082 Type2 interferon gamma + Pulsatilla chinensis saponins group vs. interferon gamma group Serum C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1082 Type2 interferon gamma + 1-methyl-tryptophan group vs. interferon gamma group Serum C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1082 Type2 interferon gamma + 1-methyl-tryptophan group vs. interferon gamma group Colon C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1082 Type2 interferon gamma + Pulsatilla chinensis saponins group vs. interferon gamma group Colon C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1083 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Brain C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1083 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Colon C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1083 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M1083 Type2 CUMS + Pulsatilla chinensis saponins group vs. CUMS group Serum C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1083 Type2 CUMS + Pulsatilla chinensis saponins group vs. CUMS group Colon C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M1083 Type2 CUMS + Pulsatilla chinensis saponins group vs. CUMS group Brain C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M1084 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M1084 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Brain C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1084 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Colon C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1084 Type2 CUMS + Mesalazine group vs. CUMS group Brain C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M1084 Type2 CUMS + Mesalazine group vs. CUMS group Colon C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M1084 Type2 CUMS + Mesalazine group vs. CUMS group Serum C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M1087 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M1091 Type1 CMS vulnerable group vs. control group Ventral hippocampus Wistar rat Up
Study M1092 Type1 CMS group vs. control group Ventral hippocampus Wistar rat Up
Study M1093 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6N mouse Down
Study M1093 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6N mouse Down
Study M1095 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece ICR mouse Down
Study M1095 Type2 CUMS + matrine group vs. CUMS group Faece ICR mouse Up
Study M1098 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1098 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1098 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1098 Type2 CUMS + L-theanine group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1098 Type2 CUMS + L-theanine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1098 Type3 L-theanine group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1102 Type1 nitenpyram group vs. control group, male offspring Faece ICR mouse Down
Study M1102 Type1 nitenpyram group vs. control group, female offspring Faece ICR mouse Down
Study M1107 Type1 CRS + FMT of adolescent depression group vs. CRS + FMT of healthy controls group Colon C57/6 J mouse Down
Study M1108 Type2 CRS + Roseburia Intestinalis. group vs. CRS group Prefrontal cortex C57/6 J mouse Up
Study M1129 Type1 high dose of perfluorooctane sulfonate group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M1129 Type1 middle dose of perfluorooctane sulfonate group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M1138 Type2 unpredictable subchronic stress + imipramine group vs. unpredictable subchronic stress group Hippocampus Swiss mouse Down
Study M120 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M121 Type1 depressed group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M126 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Brain CD-1 mouse Up
Study M134 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M134 Type2 CRS + BH group vs. CRS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M136 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M136 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M136 Type2 CUMS + high dose of ZZHPD group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M137 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M137 Type2 CUMS + hypericin group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M137 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M147 Type3 SD acute vortioxetine group vs. SD acute control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M150 Type1 IFN-alpha group vs. control group Frontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M150 Type1 IFN-alpha group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M163 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M171 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M171 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M171 Type2 CUMS + DXS group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M175 Type2 ECT treatment depressed group post-treatment vs. baseline Plasma Human Down
Study M178 Type1 depressed group vs. control group Serum Human Down
Study M204 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Hypothalamus CD-1 mouse Down
Study M208 Type1 GCI model group vs. control group Hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M454 Type1 vascular depression model group vs. control group Hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M454 Type2 vascular depression model + YXST group vs. vascular depression model group Hippocampus ICR mouse Up
Study M457 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M459 Type1 depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M470 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M483 Type1 depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M489 Type1 depression group vs. control group Serum Human Down
Study M493 Type1 depression group vs. control group Serum Human Down
Study M512 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Goto-Kakizaki rat Down
Study M513 Type1 male MDD group vs. male HC group Serum Human Down
Study M522 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M522 Type2 CUMS + NaP group vs. CUMS group Prefrontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M523 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Brain Wistar rat Down
Study M524 Type1 hydrocortisone group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M529 Type1 depressive symptom group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M539 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M540 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M541 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M541 Type2 CUMS + low dose of AS group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M541 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M541 Type2 CUMS + high dose of AS group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M542 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M542 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M555 Type1 FMT group vs. control group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M569 Type2 LPS + HPF group vs. LPS group Serum ICR mouse Down
Study M570 Type1 CMS group vs. control group Cerebral cortex BALB/c mouse Down
Study M571 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Hypothalamus CD-1 mouse Down
Study M581 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Prefrontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M581 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M581 Type2 CUMS + high dose of S. chinensis group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M582 Type3 control + fluoxetine group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6N mouse Down
Study M583 Type1 PSD group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M583 Type2 PSD group, after vs. before fluoxetine treatment Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M592 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group, LC-MS Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M592 Type2 CUMS + low dose of XYS group vs. CUMS group, LC-MS Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M592 Type2 CUMS + high dose of XYS group vs. CUMS group, LC-MS Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M592 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group, LC-MS Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M593 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M593 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M593 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Radix Bupleuri-Radix Paeoniae Alba herb pair group vs. CUMS group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M593 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Radix Bupleuri-Radix Paeoniae Alba herb pair group vs. CUMS group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M596 Type1 elderly depression group vs. elderly control group Urine Human Down
Study M602 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M611 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Unknown
Study M619 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M627 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M629 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M629 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M629 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of coumaroylspermidine extract group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M630 Type2 acupuncture + antidepressant group, post vs. before treatment Urine Human Up
Study M632 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Unknown
Study M666 Type1 late-life depression group vs. control group Serum Human Down
Study M669 Type1 corticosterone group vs. control group Liver C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M684 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Down
Study M690 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Zhi-zi-chi decoction group vs. CUMS group Serum Balb/c mouse Down
Study M691 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M691 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Chaihu-Baishao group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M691 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Baishao group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M692 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M693 Type1 SDS group vs. control group Plasma C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M720 Type1 CUMS susceptible group vs. control group Habenula Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M722 Type1 CUMS-transferred group vs. control-transferred group Serum C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M722 Type1 CUMS-transferred group vs. control-transferred group Gut C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M724 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Serum Human Down
Study M728 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M732 Type1 CUMS + high dose of propionate group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Unknown
Study M732 Type1 CUMS + high dose of propionate group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M732 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of propionate group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M750 Type2 CUMS + CCFM1025 group vs. CUMS group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M760 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Rat Down
Study M766 Type1 CUS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M767 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M777 Type1 HFCS-MFD group vs. control group Serum C57Bl/6J mouse Down
Study M779 Type4 responder group vs. non-responder group, at baseline Plasma Human Up
Study M779 Type4 remitter group vs. non-remitter group, at baseline Plasma Human Up
Study M787 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Colon Wistar rat Up
Study M809 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Kunming mouse Down
Study M810 Type2 post-rTMS treatment vs. baseline Plasma Human Up
Study M814 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M823 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M828 Type2 ultrasonic radiation + intranasally clomipramine group vs. ultrasonic radiation group Frontal cortex Wistar rat Down
Study M828 Type2 ultrasonic radiation + intraperitoneally clomipramine group vs. ultrasonic radiation group Frontal cortex Wistar rat Down
Study M835 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M839 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M844 Type1 CORT group vs. control group PC12 cell Rat Up
Study M873 Type1 ovariectomy + CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M873 Type2 ovariectomy + CUMS + Xiang-Su volatile oil group vs. ovariectomy + CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M879 Type1 unipolar depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M882 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M884 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Ileum C57BL/6J mouse Up
Study M908 Type3 post-ketamine treatment vs. baseline Cerebrospinal fluid Human Down
Study M913 Type2 responder group, post-escitalopram treatment vs. baseline Plasma Human Up
Study M924 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M927 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M927 Type2 CUMS + Zhi-zi-chi decoction group vs. CUMS group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M928 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M942 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M942 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M942 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M942 Type2 CUMS + berberine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M942 Type2 CUMS + berberine group vs. CUMS group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M953 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M956 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M962 Type2 24h-post ketamine infusion vs. baseline Plasma Human Up
Study M969 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus ICR mouse Up
Study M969 Type2 CUMS + Changyu Daotan Decoction group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M976 Type1 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth group vs. control group Urine Human Down
Study M976 Type2 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth group, after rifaximin treatment vs. baseline Urine Human Up
Study M980 Type1 CMS group vs. control group Olfactory bulb C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M982 Type1 adult MDD group vs. adult control group Plasma Human Down
Study M982 Type2 adult MDD group, post-treatment vs. baseline Plasma Human Up
Study M983 Type2 adolescent MDD group, post-treatment vs. baseline Plasma Human Down
Study M996 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6J mouse Down