Skip to main content

L-Isoleucine


Basic information
Metabolite name

L-Isoleucine

HMDB0000172
C00407
6306
Synonyms

Iso-leucine;
Isoleucine

No. of studies

64

 

Relationship between L-Isoleucine and depression (count: 64)
Study Study Type Comparison groups Tissue Organism Up/Down regulated
Study M002 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Thalamus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M002 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M006 Type1 depressed group vs. control group Plasma Human Up
Study M013 Type3 paroxetine group vs. control group Hippocampus DBA/2OlaHsd mouse Up
Study M015 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M015 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M015 Type2 CUMS + Xiaoyaosan Nan group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M015 Type2 CUMS + Xiaoyaosan Bei group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M026 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Wistar rat Down
Study M027 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Wistar rat Down
Study M027 Type2 CUMS + CSGS group vs. CUMS group Urine Wistar rat Up
Study M051 Type3 fluoxetine group vs. control group Astrocyte Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M054 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M068 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M068 Type2 CUMS + citalopram group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M078 Type1 CORT model group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M084 Type1 melancholic depressed group vs. control group Plasma Human Up
Study M093 Type1 depression group vs. control group Serum Human Up
Study M093 Type2 paroxetine group vs. baseline Serum Human Down
Study M096 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Wistar rat Down
Study M096 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Down
Study M096 Type2 CUMS + paroxetine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Wistar rat Up
Study M096 Type2 CUMS + paroxetine group vs. CUMS group Prefrontal cortex Wistar rat Up
Study M098 Type1 depressed group vs. control group Peripheral blood mononuclear cell Human Down
Study M1042 Type1 CUMS + MCAO group vs. MCAO group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1066 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Kidney Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1066 Type2 CUMS + Xiaoyaosan group vs. CUMS group Kidney Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M107 Type1 Glu group vs. control group PC12 cell medium Rat Down
Study M107 Type1 CORT group vs. control group PC12 cell medium Rat Up
Study M1076 Type1 depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M1093 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6N mouse Down
Study M1102 Type1 nitenpyram group vs. control group, male offspring Faece ICR mouse Down
Study M1102 Type1 nitenpyram group vs. control group, female offspring Faece ICR mouse Down
Study M130 Type2 CSDS + DG group vs. CSDS group Prefrontal cortex C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M130 Type2 CSDS + venlafaxine group vs. CSDS group Prefrontal cortex C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M132 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M132 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M457 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M457 Type2 CUMS + D6 doses of PBR group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M460 Type1 depressed group vs. control group Liver Kunming mouse Up
Study M486 Type1 CORT group vs. control group PC12 cell medium Rat Up
Study M510 Type1 HSD group vs. control group Urine Human Up
Study M520 Type1 depressive HCV group vs. non-depressive HCV group Plasma Human Down
Study M522 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Unknown
Study M541 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M541 Type2 CUMS + high dose of AS group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M541 Type2 CUMS + low dose of AS group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M541 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M547 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M552 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M552 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Chaigui group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M552 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Chaigui group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M552 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M552 Type2 CUMS + augmentation treatment group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M552 Type2 CUMS + median dose of Chaigui group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M555 Type1 FMT group vs. control group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M577 Type1 male depression group vs. male control group, aged 30-39 Plasma Human Unknown
Study M577 Type1 male depression group vs. male control group, aged 20-29 Plasma Human Unknown
Study M577 Type1 male depression group vs. male control group, aged 40-49 Plasma Human Unknown
Study M584 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M584 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Radix Bupleuri-Radix Paeoniae Alba herb pair group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M584 Type2 CUMS + high dose of negative control treatment group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M584 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Xiaoyaosan group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M584 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Radix Bupleuri-Radix Paeoniae Alba herb pair group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M584 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Xiaoyaosan group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M589 Type1 current depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Up
Study M591 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Plasma CD-1 mouse Up
Study M592 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group, NMR Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M592 Type2 CUMS + high dose of XYS group vs. CUMS group, LC-MS Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M610 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Kidney Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M611 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Unknown
Study M629 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M629 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of coumaroylspermidine extract group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M633 Type1 corticosterone group vs. control group Urine C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M633 Type2 corticosterone + Chrysanthemum morifolium group vs. corticosterone group Urine C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M663 Type3 diterpene ginkgolides group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M669 Type1 corticosterone group vs. control group Liver C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M680 Type2 5-fluorouracil + FMT group vs. 5-fluorouracil + sham FMT group Prefrontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M721 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M722 Type1 CUMS-transferred group vs. control-transferred group Serum C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M779 Type1 depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Up
Study M779 Type2 depression group, post vs. before treatment Plasma Human Down
Study M791 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Cecum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M809 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Kunming mouse Down
Study M809 Type2 CUMS + Milletia speciosa Champ group vs. CUMS group Serum Kunming mouse Up
Study M815 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M815 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Radix Bupleuri–Radix Paeoniae Alba group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M815 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Radix Bupleuri–Radix Paeoniae Alba group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M821 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M827 Type1 CUMS + middle dose of Millettia speciosa Champ group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M827 Type1 CUMS + low dose of Millettia speciosa Champ group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M827 Type1 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M827 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M847 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M847 Type2 CUMS + Bupleuri Radix group vs. CUMS group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M870 Type2 CRS + middle dose of Jia Wei Xiao Yao San group vs. CRS group Brain C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M877 Type1 depressed COPD group vs. COPD group Plasma Human Down
Study M882 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M882 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M908 Type3 post-ketamine treatment vs. baseline Plasma Human Up
Study M913 Type2 responder group, post-escitalopram treatment vs. baseline Plasma Human Up
Study M918 Type1 methamphetamine group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M924 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M924 Type2 CUMS + aerobic exercise group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M943 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Liver ICR mouse Down
Study M943 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Acanthopanax senticosus Harms group vs. CUMS group Liver ICR mouse Down
Study M943 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of Acanthopanax senticosus Harms group vs. CUMS group Liver ICR mouse Down
Study M950 Type2 probiotic group vs. placebo group Faece Human Up
Study M965 Type1 CUMS depression group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M975 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M975 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M975 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of Yang-Xin-Jie-Yu Decoction group vs. CUMS group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M975 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Yang-Xin-Jie-Yu Decoction group vs. CUMS group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up