Skip to main content

Arachidonic acid


Basic information
Metabolite name

Arachidonic acid

HMDB0001043
C00219
444899
Synonyms

5,8,11,14-Eicosatetraenoic acid;
Arachidonic Acid (peroxide free);
Arachidonic acid isomer

No. of studies

59

 

Relationship between Arachidonic acid and depression (count: 59)
Study Study Type Comparison groups Tissue Organism Up/Down regulated
Study M002 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Thalamus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M018 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M028 Type2 sertraline group 4-week treatment vs. baseline Serum Human Down
Study M042 Type3 fluoxetine group vs. control group Plasma Rhesus monkey Down
Study M076 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M076 Type2 CUMS + Anemarrhena saponins and Lilium saponins group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M083 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M084 Type1 melancholic depressed group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M087 Type2 ketamine group 2-h vs. baseline Plasma Human Up
Study M092 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex CD-1 mouse Up
Study M1007 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1007 Type2 CUMS + bifid triple viable capsules group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1019 Type1 depression group vs. control group Serum Human Down
Study M1024 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum ICR mouse Up
Study M1024 Type2 CUMS + hydroxytyrosol group vs. CUMS group CA3 region of hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M1024 Type2 CUMS + hydroxytyrosol group vs. CUMS group Serum ICR mouse Down
Study M1024 Type2 CUMS + hydroxytyrosol group vs. CUMS group CA1 region of hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M1024 Type2 CUMS + hydroxytyrosol group vs. CUMS group DG region of hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M1032 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M104 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M104 Type2 CUMS + BH group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M104 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M104 Type2 CUMS + ZB group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1087 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M1093 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6N mouse Down
Study M1096 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1096 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Xiaoyao Pills group vs. CUMS group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1096 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of Xiaoyao Pills group vs. CUMS group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1096 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Xiaoyao Pills group vs. CUMS group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1096 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M110 Type1 SD group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1111 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M1111 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M1111 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M1111 Type2 CUMS + rTMS group vs. CUMS group Prefrontal cortex C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M1111 Type2 CUMS + rTMS group vs. CUMS group Plasma C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M130 Type2 CSDS + venlafaxine group vs. CSDS group Prefrontal cortex C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M130 Type2 CSDS + DG group vs. CSDS group Prefrontal cortex C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M131 Type1 LH group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M131 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M131 Type1 SD group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M181 Type3 venlafaxine group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M207 Type1 depressed group vs. control group Serum Kunming mouse Down
Study M208 Type1 GCI model group vs. control group Hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M209 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M460 Type1 depressed group vs. control group Liver Kunming mouse Up
Study M464 Type1 drug-treatment MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M464 Type1 drug-naive MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M472 Type3 (2R,6R)-HNK group vs. control group PC12 cell Rat Down
Study M548 Type1 FSL group vs. FRL group, left hippocampus Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M548 Type1 FSL group vs. FRL group, left prefrontal cortex Prefrontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M548 Type1 FSL group vs. FRL group, right hippocampus Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M555 Type1 FMT group vs. control group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M569 Type2 LPS + HPF group vs. LPS group Hippocampus ICR mouse Up
Study M569 Type2 LPS + HPF group vs. LPS group Serum ICR mouse Up
Study M573 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M582 Type3 control + fluoxetine group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6N mouse Up
Study M592 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group, LC-MS Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M592 Type2 CUMS + high dose of XYS group vs. CUMS group, LC-MS Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M592 Type2 CUMS + low dose of XYS group vs. CUMS group, LC-MS Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M592 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group, LC-MS Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M593 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M593 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Radix Bupleuri-Radix Paeoniae Alba herb pair group vs. CUMS group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M593 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Radix Bupleuri-Radix Paeoniae Alba herb pair group vs. CUMS group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M593 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M598 Type1 MS group vs. control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M600 Type2 high-fat diet + fish oil group vs. high-fat diet group Forebrain C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M616 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Olfactory bulb Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M632 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Unknown
Study M670 Type2 corticosterone + nicotinamide mononucleotide group vs. corticosterone group Liver C57/BL6 mouse Down
Study M681 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M681 Type2 CUMS + Chaihu Shu Gan San group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M690 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Zhi-zi-chi decoction group vs. CUMS group Serum Balb/c mouse Up
Study M691 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M691 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Baishao group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M691 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Chaihu group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M691 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Chaihu-Baishao group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M696 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M696 Type2 CUMS + liquiritin group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M696 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M712 Type1 depression group vs. control group Amygdala Cynomolgus monkey Down
Study M744 Type1 CUS transplant group vs. control transplant group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M769 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Amygdala Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M774 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Serum Human Down
Study M775 Type1 prenatal stress group vs. control group Brain Swiss Webster mouse Down
Study M784 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M784 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M784 Type2 CUMS + liquiritin group vs. CUMS group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M789 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M789 Type2 CUMS + liquiritin group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M789 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M800 Type3 fluoxetine group vs. control group Prelimbic cortex Rhesus monkey Down
Study M858 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M887 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M888 Type1 CUMS microbiota group vs. control microbiota group Serum C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M928 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M935 Type3 tianeptine group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Up
Study M935 Type4 chronic social isolation + tianeptine group vs. chronic social isolation + tianeptine resilient group Hippocampus Wistar rat Up
Study M947 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M947 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of Chaigui granules group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M947 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Chaigui granules group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M981 Type1 Abeta oligomer group vs. control group Serum ICR mouse Up
Study M981 Type2 Abeta oligomer + involuntary and voluntary running group vs. Abeta oligomer group Serum ICR mouse Down
Study M981 Type2 Abeta oligomer + involuntary and voluntary running + acousto-optic stimulation group vs. Abeta oligomer group Serum ICR mouse Down