Skip to main content

Betaine


Basic information
Metabolite name

Betaine

HMDB0000043
C00719
247
Synonyms

N,N,N-trimethylglycinium

No. of studies

37

 

Relationship between Betaine and depression (count: 37)
Study Study Type Comparison groups Tissue Organism Up/Down regulated
Study M014 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M014 Type2 CUMS + XY-A group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M032 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M032 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of genipin group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M032 Type2 CUMS + high dose of genipin group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M032 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M033 Type3 paroxetine group vs. control group Hippocampus DBA/2OlaHsd mouse Down
Study M050 Type3 14h Ketamine group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M050 Type3 2h Ketamine group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M072 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M072 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M077 Type1 non-weaned FST group vs. weaned FST group Urine Wistar rat Down
Study M077 Type1 non-weaned group vs. weaned group Urine Wistar rat Down
Study M1024 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum ICR mouse Up
Study M104 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M104 Type2 CUMS + ZB group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M104 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M104 Type2 CUMS + BH group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1044 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1056 Type1 maternal separation group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1093 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6N mouse Down
Study M1097 Type1 placebo-treated depression group vs. control group Faece Human Up
Study M1097 Type2 probiotic-treated depression group vs. placebo-treated depression group Faece Human Down
Study M1102 Type1 nitenpyram group vs. control group, female offspring Faece ICR mouse Down
Study M1102 Type1 nitenpyram group vs. control group, male offspring Faece ICR mouse Down
Study M114 Type3 venlafaxine group vs. control group Astrocyte Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M116 Type3 ketamine group vs. control group Cerebrospinal fluid Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M146 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M146 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M146 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of SSO group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M146 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M146 Type2 CUMS + high dose of SSO group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M146 Type2 CUMS + high dose of SSO group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M146 Type2 CUMS + venlafaxine group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M464 Type1 drug-naive MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M464 Type1 drug-treatment MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M578 Type1 restraint stress offspring group vs. control offspring group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M613 Type1 CSDS susceptible group vs. control group Medial prefrontal cortex C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M631 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Kunming mouse Up
Study M631 Type2 CUMS + high dose of iridoid-rich fraction of V. jatamansi group vs. CUMS group Serum Kunming mouse Down
Study M647 Type1 antepartum depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M661 Type1 PSD group vs. stroke group Plasma Human Down
Study M712 Type1 depression group vs. control group Liver Cynomolgus monkey Down
Study M767 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M772 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Amygdala Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M773 Type1 antenatal depression group vs. non-antenatal depression group Serum Human Up
Study M806 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M806 Type2 corticosterone + taxifolin spina group vs. corticosterone group Urine C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M806 Type2 corticosterone + Gleditsiae spina group vs. corticosterone group Urine C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M815 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M815 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Radix Bupleuri–Radix Paeoniae Alba group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M815 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Radix Bupleuri–Radix Paeoniae Alba group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M820 Type3 multiple-dose nefazodone group vs. multiple-dose control group Brain ICR mouse Up
Study M821 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M847 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M850 Type1 reserpine group vs. control group Brain C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M869 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Peripheral blood mononuclear cell Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M869 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Chaigui granules group vs. CUMS group Peripheral blood mononuclear cell Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M908 Type3 post-ketamine treatment vs. baseline Cerebrospinal fluid Human Down
Study M912 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum ICR mouse Up
Study M913 Type2 responder group, post-escitalopram treatment vs. baseline Plasma Human Up
Study M926 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Cerebrospinal fluid C57BL/6 J mouse Down