Skip to main content

Cholic acid


Basic information
Metabolite name

Cholic acid

HMDB0000619
C00695
221493
Synonyms

Cholate

No. of studies

36

 

Relationship between Cholic acid and depression (count: 36)
Study Study Type Comparison groups Tissue Organism Up/Down regulated
Study M007 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Plasma Wistar rat Up
Study M048 Type1 CVS group vs. control group Serum Wistar rat Down
Study M048 Type2 CVS + CSGS group vs. CVS group Serum Wistar rat Up
Study M048 Type2 CVS + fluoxetine group vs. CVS group Serum Wistar rat Up
Study M074 Type1 sCSDS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6JJmsSlc mouse Up
Study M084 Type1 melancholic depressed group vs. control group Plasma Human Up
Study M095 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1022 Type1 CUS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M1022 Type2 CUS + fructooligosaccharide + galactooligosaccharides group vs. CUS group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M1022 Type2 CUS + Tongxieyaofang acidic polysaccharide group vs. CUS group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M1022 Type2 CUS + middle dose of Tongxieyaofang neutral polysaccharide group vs. CUS group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M1022 Type2 CUS + high dose of Tongxieyaofang neutral polysaccharide group vs. CUS group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M1024 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group CA3 region of hippocampus ICR mouse Up
Study M1024 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group DG region of hippocampus ICR mouse Up
Study M1024 Type2 CUMS + hydroxytyrosol group vs. CUMS group CA1 region of hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M1024 Type2 CUMS + hydroxytyrosol group vs. CUMS group CA3 region of hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M1024 Type2 CUMS + hydroxytyrosol group vs. CUMS group DG region of hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M1032 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M104 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M104 Type2 CUMS + BH group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M104 Type2 CUMS + ZB group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M104 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1045 Type1 anxiety and depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M1053 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1053 Type2 CUMS + quercetin group vs. CUMS group Liver Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1056 Type1 maternal separation group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1072 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Cynomolgus monkey Up
Study M1103 Type1 SLE with depression group vs. control group Faece Human Down
Study M114 Type3 venlafaxine group vs. control group Astrocyte Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M117 Type1 CVS group vs. control group Faece Wistar rat Up
Study M120 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M512 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Goto-Kakizaki rat Up
Study M541 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M541 Type2 CUMS + high dose of AS group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M582 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6N mouse Down
Study M582 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Faece C57BL/6N mouse Up
Study M582 Type3 control + fluoxetine group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6N mouse Up
Study M604 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M604 Type2 CUMS + PBR group vs. CUMS group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M608 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M608 Type2 CUMS + Poria cocos group vs. CUMS group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M613 Type1 CSDS susceptible group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M648 Type1 ART-treated HIV with depressive symptom group vs. ART-treated HIV without depressive symptom group, discovery cohort Plasma Human Up
Study M689 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M691 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M691 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Chaihu-Baishao group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M691 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Baishao group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M691 Type2 CUMS + low dose of Chaihu group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M743 Type1 CUS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M749 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Cynomolgus monkey Up
Study M858 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M867 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M867 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M867 Type2 CUMS + Baihe-Dihuang Tang group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Unknown
Study M883 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Blood Human Down
Study M907 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M928 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M936 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M947 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M947 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of Chaigui granules group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M947 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Chaigui granules group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M964 Type1 D-galactose + CUMS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M964 Type2 D-galactose + CUMS + imipramine group vs. D-galactose + CUMS group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down