Skip to main content

Glycerophosphocholine


Basic information
Metabolite name

Glycerophosphocholine

HMDB0000086
C00670
657272
Synonyms

Glycerophosphate choline;
Glycerophosphorylcholine;
Glyceroylphosphocholine;
GPC

No. of studies

34

 

Relationship between Glycerophosphocholine and depression (count: 34)
Study Study Type Comparison groups Tissue Organism Up/Down regulated
Study M033 Type3 paroxetine group vs. control group Hippocampus DBA/2OlaHsd mouse Down
Study M036 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Urine Human Down
Study M044 Type2 CUMS + rTMS group vs. CUMS + sham rTMS group Prefrontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M044 Type3 control + rTMS group vs. control + sham rTMS group Prefrontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M050 Type3 2h Ketamine group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M058 Type1 depressed HBV-infected patients group vs. control group and non-depressed HBV-infected group Urine Human Down
Study M076 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M081 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Liver Wistar rat Down
Study M101 Type1 CSD group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M102 Type1 moderate MDD group vs. control group Urine Human Down
Study M1024 Type2 CUMS + hydroxytyrosol group vs. CUMS group DG region of hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M1024 Type2 CUMS + hydroxytyrosol group vs. CUMS group CA3 region of hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M107 Type1 CORT group vs. control group PC12 cell Rat Up
Study M107 Type1 Glu group vs. control group PC12 cell Rat Up
Study M1097 Type1 placebo-treated depression group vs. control group Faece Human Up
Study M1098 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1098 Type2 CUMS + L-theanine group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1098 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Serum Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1102 Type1 nitenpyram group vs. control group, male offspring Faece ICR mouse Down
Study M115 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Up
Study M148 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Liver Wistar rat Down
Study M148 Type2 CUMS + CSGS group vs. CUMS group Liver Wistar rat Up
Study M148 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Liver Wistar rat Up
Study M208 Type1 GCI model group vs. control group Hippocampus ICR mouse Up
Study M458 Type1 depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M473 Type1 high-fat diet group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex C57BL/6J mouse Up
Study M486 Type1 CORT group vs. control group PC12 cell Rat Up
Study M539 Type2 LPS+ Dl-3-n-butylphthalide group vs. LPS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M540 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M540 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M569 Type2 LPS + HPF group vs. LPS group Serum ICR mouse Down
Study M598 Type1 MS group vs. control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M613 Type1 CSDS susceptible group vs. control group Nucleus accumbens C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M613 Type1 CSDS susceptible group vs. control group Ventral hippocampus C57BL/6 J mouse Up
Study M690 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Zhi-zi-chi decoction group vs. CUMS group Serum Balb/c mouse Down
Study M712 Type1 depression group vs. control group Hippocampus Cynomolgus monkey Up
Study M712 Type1 depression group vs. control group Amygdala Cynomolgus monkey Up
Study M740 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Soleus muscle Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M769 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Amygdala Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M773 Type1 antenatal depression group vs. non-antenatal depression group Serum Human Down
Study M840 Type1 A1/A2 beta-casein group vs. control group Frontal cortex Wistar rat Up
Study M867 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M883 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Blood Human Up
Study M927 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M927 Type2 CUMS + Zhi-zi-chi decoction group vs. CUMS group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down