Skip to main content

Quinolinic acid


Basic information
Metabolite name

Quinolinic acid

HMDB0000232
C03722
1066
Synonyms

QUIN;
quinolinate

No. of studies

37

 

Relationship between Quinolinic acid and depression (count: 37)
Study Study Type Comparison groups Tissue Organism Up/Down regulated
Study M034 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Urine Human Down
Study M068 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M068 Type2 CUMS + citalopram group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M096 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Up
Study M096 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Wistar rat Up
Study M096 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Wistar rat Up
Study M096 Type2 CUMS + paroxetine group vs. CUMS group Plasma Wistar rat Down
Study M096 Type2 CUMS + paroxetine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Wistar rat Down
Study M096 Type2 CUMS + paroxetine group vs. CUMS group Prefrontal cortex Wistar rat Down
Study M097 Type1 depressed women group vs. control women group Urine Human Down
Study M097 Type1 depressed men group vs. control men group Urine Human Down
Study M101 Type1 CSD group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M1033 Type1 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic constipation group vs. control group Urine Human Up
Study M1033 Type1 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic diarrhea group vs. control group Urine Human Up
Study M1033 Type2 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic constipation group, after rifaximin treatment vs. baseline Urine Human Down
Study M1033 Type2 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic diarrhea group, after rifaximin treatment vs. baseline Urine Human Down
Study M1034 Type1 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic constipation group vs. control group Urine Human Up
Study M1034 Type1 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic diarrhea group vs. control group Urine Human Up
Study M1035 Type2 mood disorder group, after tryptophan-rich diet vs. baseline Urine Human Down
Study M1036 Type1 IBS-D group vs. control group Urine Human Up
Study M1036 Type2 IBS-D with low-tryptophan and FODMAP diet subgroup, after diet intervention vs. baseline Urine Human Down
Study M109 Type1 PPD group vs. HC and PPWD group Urine Human Up
Study M1107 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Colon C57/6 J mouse Up
Study M1107 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex C57/6 J mouse Up
Study M1107 Type1 CRS + FMT of adolescent depression group vs. CRS + FMT of healthy controls group Prefrontal cortex C57/6 J mouse Up
Study M1107 Type2 CRS + FMT of healthy controls group vs. CRS group Colon C57/6 J mouse Down
Study M1107 Type2 CRS + FMT of healthy controls group vs. CRS group Prefrontal cortex C57/6 J mouse Down
Study M1108 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Colon C57/6 J mouse Up
Study M1108 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex C57/6 J mouse Up
Study M1108 Type2 CRS + Roseburia Intestinalis. group vs. CRS group Colon C57/6 J mouse Down
Study M1108 Type2 CRS + Roseburia Intestinalis. group vs. CRS group Prefrontal cortex C57/6 J mouse Down
Study M126 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Brain CD-1 mouse Up
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained fluoxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Striatum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained fluoxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Frontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained fluoxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Hypothalamus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained fluoxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained fluoxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained vortioxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained vortioxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained fluoxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Cerebellum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained fluoxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Midbrain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained vortioxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained vortioxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Frontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained vortioxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Midbrain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained vortioxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Striatum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained fluoxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained vortioxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Hypothalamus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type2 FSL sustained vortioxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Cerebellum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained vortioxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Cerebellum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained fluoxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Hypothalamus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained fluoxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Cerebellum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained fluoxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained vortioxetine group vs. FSL sustained control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained vortioxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Striatum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained fluoxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained fluoxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Midbrain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained fluoxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Striatum Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained fluoxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Frontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained vortioxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Frontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained vortioxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Midbrain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained vortioxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained vortioxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Hypothalamus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained fluoxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M147 Type3 SD sustained vortioxetine group vs. SD sustained control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M150 Type1 IFN-alpha group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M150 Type2 IFN-alpha + imipramine group vs. IFN-alpha group Frontal cortex Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M151 Type1 Male FSL group vs. Male FRL group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M151 Type1 Female FSL group vs. Female FRL group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M159 Type1 depressed group vs. control group Cerebrospinal fluid Human Up
Study M175 Type2 ECT treatment depressed group post-treatment vs. baseline Plasma Human Down
Study M184 Type1 depressed group vs. control group Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex Human Down
Study M450 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M450 Type2 CUMS + paroxetine group vs. CUMS group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M470 Type1 rMDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Up
Study M518 Type1 depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M524 Type1 hydrocortisone group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M524 Type2 hydrocortisone + Tiansi Liquid group vs. hydrocortisone group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M542 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M542 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M542 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M550 Type2 CUMS + GTD group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M596 Type1 elderly depression group vs. elderly control group Urine Human Up
Study M613 Type1 CSDS susceptible group vs. control group Ventral hippocampus C57BL/6 J mouse Down
Study M684 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Up
Study M684 Type2 LPS + electroacupuncture group vs. LPS group Hippocampus Wistar rat Down
Study M699 Type1 depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M715 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Faece Human Down
Study M732 Type1 CUMS + high dose of propionate group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Unknown
Study M823 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M865 Type1 HIV with depression group vs. HIV without depression group Plasma Human Up
Study M876 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Up
Study M894 Type2 electromagnetic field exposure + heat acclimation group vs. electromagnetic field exposure group Serum C57BL/6J mouse Up
Study M897 Type2 behavioral activation therapy, post-therapy vs. pre-therapy Serum Human Down
Study M976 Type1 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth group vs. control group Urine Human Up
Study M976 Type2 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth group, after rifaximin treatment vs. baseline Urine Human Down