Skip to main content

Xanthurenic acid


Basic information
Metabolite name

Xanthurenic acid

HMDB0000881
C02470
5699
Synonyms

Xanthureniac acid;
Xanthurenate

No. of studies

27

 

Relationship between Xanthurenic acid and depression (count: 27)
Study Study Type Comparison groups Tissue Organism Up/Down regulated
Study M008 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M012 Type1 CVS group vs. control group Urine Wistar rat Down
Study M012 Type2 CVS + fluoxetine group vs. CVS group Urine Wistar rat Up
Study M012 Type2 CVS + CSGS group vs. CVS group Urine Wistar rat Up
Study M024 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M024 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Xiaoyaosan group vs. CUMS group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M046 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Nucleus accumbens C57BL/6N mouse Up
Study M046 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Dorsal hippocampus C57BL/6N mouse Up
Study M046 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Ventral hippocampus C57BL/6N mouse Up
Study M046 Type1 LPS group vs. control group Central amygdala C57BL/6N mouse Up
Study M049 Type2 xiaoyansan treatment 8-week vs. baseline Urine Human Up
Study M050 Type3 14h Ketamine group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M050 Type3 2h Ketamine group vs. control group Hippocampus C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M053 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Wistar rat Down
Study M053 Type2 CUMS + CSGS group vs. CUMS group Urine Wistar rat Up
Study M068 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M101 Type1 CSD group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M1033 Type1 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic diarrhea group vs. control group Urine Human Up
Study M1033 Type1 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic constipation group vs. control group Urine Human Up
Study M1033 Type2 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic diarrhea group, after rifaximin treatment vs. baseline Urine Human Down
Study M1033 Type2 small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and chronic constipation group, after rifaximin treatment vs. baseline Urine Human Down
Study M1090 Type2 CUMS + hyperbaric oxygen treatment group vs. CUMS group Plasma BALb/c mouse Up
Study M112 Type5 paroxetine-treated responder group vs. non-responder group Hippocampus DBA/2J mouse Up
Study M516 Type1 SMG-treated group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M542 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M596 Type1 elderly depression group vs. elderly control group Urine Human Up
Study M602 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M630 Type2 acupuncture + antidepressant group, post vs. before treatment Urine Human Down
Study M633 Type1 corticosterone group vs. control group Urine C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M672 Type1 SMG group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M672 Type2 SMG + Hemerocallis citrina extracts group vs. SMG group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M672 Type2 SMG + paroxetine group vs. SMG group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M674 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M682 Type1 fenvalerate-treated male offspring group vs. control male offspring group Serum ICR mouse Up
Study M701 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M724 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Serum Human Down
Study M806 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Urine C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M806 Type2 corticosterone + Gleditsiae spina group vs. corticosterone group Urine C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M806 Type2 corticosterone + taxifolin spina group vs. corticosterone group Urine C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M850 Type1 reserpine group vs. control group Brain C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M879 Type1 unipolar depression group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M912 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Serum ICR mouse Up