Skip to main content

Valeric acid


Basic information
Metabolite name

Valeric acid

HMDB0000892
C00803
7991
Synonyms

Pentanoic acid;
Valerate

No. of studies

23

 

Relationship between Valeric acid and depression (count: 23)
Study Study Type Comparison groups Tissue Organism Up/Down regulated
Study M074 Type1 sCSDS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6JJmsSlc mouse Up
Study M1002 Type2 high-fat diet + Xiaoyao San group vs. high-fat diet group Faece C57Bl6/J mouse Up
Study M1003 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1003 Type2 CUMS + Morinda officinalis oligosaccharide group vs. CUMS group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1009 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M1009 Type2 CUMS + multi-probiotics group vs. CUMS group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M1017 Type1 post-stroke depression group vs. control group Serum C57BL/6j mouse Up
Study M1019 Type1 depression group vs. control group Serum Human Down
Study M1025 Type2 CUMS + Bacillus licheniformis group vs. CUMS group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M1042 Type1 CUMS + MCAO group vs. MCAO group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M1087 Type1 CSDS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M648 Type1 ART-treated HIV with depressive symptom group vs. ART-treated HIV without depressive symptom group, discovery cohort Plasma Human Up
Study M665 Type1 CRS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Down
Study M706 Type2 CUMS + CCFM1025 group vs. CUMS group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M731 Type1 MDD group vs. control group Plasma Human Down
Study M773 Type1 antenatal depression group vs. non-antenatal depression group Serum Human Down
Study M804 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M804 Type2 CUMS + fluoxetine group vs. CUMS group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M804 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of WYJYD group vs. CUMS group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M804 Type2 CUMS + high dose of WYJYD group vs. CUMS group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M872 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M886 Type2 lead-exposed + probiotics group vs. lead-exposed group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M900 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M900 Type2 CUMS + Semen Sojae Praeparatum group vs. CUMS group Faece Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M956 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece C57BL/6J mouse Down
Study M956 Type2 CUMS + deoiled sunflower seeds group vs. CUMS group Faece C57BL/6J mouse Up
Study M981 Type1 Abeta oligomer group vs. control group Serum ICR mouse Up
Study M985 Type2 CUMS + indole acetic acid group vs. CUMS group Cecum C57BL/6J mouse Up
Study M990 Type1 aged microbiota transplant group vs. young microbiota transplant group Faece C57BL/6 mouse Up
Study M999 Type2 CRS + high dose of neoagaro-oligosaccharides group vs. CRS group Faece C57BL/6J mouse Up
Study M999 Type2 CRS + low dose of neoagaro-oligosaccharides group vs. CRS group Faece C57BL/6J mouse Up
Study M999 Type2 CRS + paroxetine group vs. CRS group Faece C57BL/6J mouse Up