Skip to main content

Palmitoylethanolamide


Basic information
Metabolite name

Palmitoylethanolamide

HMDB0002100
C16512
4671
Synonyms

N-palmitoylethanolamine;
Palmitoyl ethanolamide

No. of studies

12

 

Relationship between Palmitoylethanolamide and depression (count: 12)
Study Study Type Comparison groups Tissue Organism Up/Down regulated
Study M1054 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Plasma ICR mouse Down
Study M1054 Type2 CUMS + ChaihuYujinxiang granules group vs. CUMS group Plasma ICR mouse Up
Study M1072 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Faece Cynomolgus monkey Down
Study M160 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Adipose tissue Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M160 Type2 CUMS + CWD group vs. CUMS group Adipose tissue Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M208 Type1 GCI model group vs. control group Hippocampus ICR mouse Down
Study M498 Type3 chronic tianeptine group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Down
Study M498 Type3 chronic escitalopram group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Up
Study M498 Type3 chronic imipramine group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Wistar rat Up
Study M498 Type3 acute escitalopram group vs. control group Cerebellum Wistar rat Down
Study M498 Type3 chronic tianeptine group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Wistar rat Down
Study M498 Type3 acute escitalopram group vs. control group Frontal cortex Wistar rat Down
Study M498 Type3 chronic escitalopram group vs. control group Cerebellum Wistar rat Down
Study M498 Type3 chronic escitalopram group vs. control group Frontal cortex Wistar rat Down
Study M498 Type3 acute imipramine group vs. control group Cerebellum Wistar rat Down
Study M498 Type3 chronic imipramine group vs. control group Cerebellum Wistar rat Down
Study M498 Type3 chronic URB597 group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Wistar rat Up
Study M498 Type3 chronic imipramine group vs. control group Dorsal striatum Wistar rat Up
Study M498 Type3 acute imipramine group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Up
Study M498 Type3 chronic URB597 group vs. control group Cerebellum Wistar rat Up
Study M498 Type3 acute URB597 group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Down
Study M498 Type3 chronic N-acetylcysteine group vs. control group Dorsal striatum Wistar rat Up
Study M498 Type3 chronic N-acetylcysteine group vs. control group Frontal cortex Wistar rat Up
Study M498 Type3 chronic N-acetylcysteine group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Wistar rat Up
Study M498 Type3 chronic URB597 group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Down
Study M498 Type3 acute tianeptine group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Down
Study M500 Type3 repeated URB597 group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Up
Study M500 Type3 single URB597 group vs. control group Hippocampus Wistar rat Up
Study M500 Type3 single URB597 group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Wistar rat Up
Study M500 Type3 repeated URB597 group vs. control group Prefrontal cortex Wistar rat Up
Study M500 Type3 repeated URB597 group vs. control group Midbrain Wistar rat Up
Study M500 Type3 single URB597 group vs. control group Midbrain Wistar rat Up
Study M503 Type2 SDS + URB694 group vs. SDS group Plasma Wistar Kyoto rat Up
Study M578 Type1 restraint stress offspring group vs. control offspring group Hippocampus Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M598 Type1 MS group vs. control group Brain Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M811 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of dipyrone group vs. CUMS group Amygdala Balb/c mouse Up
Study M846 Type2 postpartum depression model + 919 syrup group vs. postpartum depression model group Hippocampus BALB/c mouse Up
Study M869 Type1 CUMS group vs. control group Peripheral blood mononuclear cell Sprague-Dawley rat Down
Study M869 Type2 CUMS + middle dose of Chaigui granules group vs. CUMS group Peripheral blood mononuclear cell Sprague-Dawley rat Up
Study M869 Type2 CUMS + high dose of Chaigui granules group vs. CUMS group Peripheral blood mononuclear cell Sprague-Dawley rat Up